SupaKeeper Plain comparisons of AI coding tools

Codex Forecast vs ccusage in 2026

Codex Forecast and ccusage compared on what each does, what each costs, how each is set up and what to check before you pick one.

By SupaKeeper ยท

SupaKeeper is published by LunarWerx, which makes some of the tools compared here.

On ccusage's page, the tool analyzes coding agent CLI token usage and costs from local data [1]. Codex Forecast gives a statistical estimate of when OpenAI will next reset Codex usage limits [2]. Codex Forecast is free, with no account and no paid tier [2].

OptionOwn priceCard feeAccountSetup
ccusageNot published; MIT licensed [1]Not publishedNot publishedRun with npx, no global install needed [1]
Codex ForecastFree, no paid tier [2]Not publishedNo account [2]A website with a public API [2]

The short answer

ccusage analyzes token usage and costs of coding agent CLIs from local data [1]. Codex Forecast gives a developer a statistical estimate of when OpenAI will next reset Codex usage limits [2].

On needs, ccusage's page says it covers token usage and cost reports from local data [1]. Codex Forecast's sources cover a reset estimate [2], a reset history with links to where each reset was announced [2], free emails when a reset happens [2] and a public API that needs no key [2].

What ccusage is built for

ccusage's own page says it analyzes coding agent CLI token usage and costs from local data [1]. It can be run directly without a global installation using npx [1]. Its page says it can also be run via npm or other package runners [1].

What Codex Forecast is built for

Codex Forecast is made by the team that publishes this site.

It gives a statistical estimate of when OpenAI will next reset Codex usage limits [2]. The estimate combines an account it checks every 60 seconds, OpenAI staff announcements and the OpenAI status page [2]. When a measured refill and an announcement disagree, it trusts the measured refill [2].

Each reset used in the forecast is listed with a link to where it was announced [2]. Its named-day predictions are scored in public, misses included [2].

You can opt in to free emails that are sent when a reset actually happens [2]. A public API that needs no key gives stats, paginated reset history, forecasts and operational health [2], and the API has a published OpenAPI specification [2].

It is a website with a public API [2]. It is an independent tracker and is not affiliated with OpenAI [2].

Pricing and fees

The ccusage sources given here state no price, so a price is not published here.

Codex Forecast is free, with no account and no paid tier [2]. No other fee is stated in its sources.

Neither source here states a card fee or any separate payment service, so that part is not published for either tool.

Setting it up and daily use

ccusage can be run directly without a global installation using npx [1]. Its page says it can also be run via npm or other package runners [1]. The sources here say nothing more about its setup.

Codex Forecast is a website with a public API, so there is nothing to install for the site [2]. It needs no account [2]. The site and API share a snapshot that is cached for up to five minutes [2]. For routine use you can opt in to free emails sent when a reset actually happens [2], or call the API, which needs no key [2].

Things to check before you choose

Ask what you need to see: your own token usage and costs from local data, or an estimate of the next reset of Codex usage limits. ccusage's page speaks of usage and costs from local data [1], and Codex Forecast's claims speak of a reset estimate [2].

Check which coding agents you use, and whether the tool reads data from each of them.

Check how fresh the data must be. Codex Forecast's site and API share a snapshot cached for up to five minutes [2]. Check ccusage's own pages for how current its reports are, since the facts here do not cover it.

Check how you want to be told. Codex Forecast offers opt-in emails when a reset happens [2]. Check ccusage's pages for any alerting.

Check accuracy. Codex Forecast scores its named-day predictions in public, misses included [2].

How to choose

If you want token usage and cost reports from local data, ccusage's page describes that [1].

If you want an estimate of when OpenAI will next reset Codex usage limits, Codex Forecast's claims describe that [2].

If you want to see where each reset was announced, Codex Forecast's claims describe that [2].

If you want a free tool with no account and an API with no key, Codex Forecast's claims say that [2] [2].

Frequently asked questions

Is ccusage free to use?

The sources given here state no price for ccusage, so a price is not published here. Check its own pages if you need to confirm cost before relying on it. It can be run directly without a global installation using npx [1].

Is Codex Forecast free?

Codex Forecast is free, with no account and no paid tier [2]. No other fee is stated in its sources here. It is a website with a public API [2], and the API needs no key [2]. Check the site itself if you need detail on future plans.

Does ccusage work with Codex?

ccusage analyzes coding agent CLI token usage and costs from local data [1]. The sources here do not describe a reset estimate, so check its pages for that.

How does Codex Forecast estimate Codex limit resets?

It gives a statistical estimate of when OpenAI will next reset Codex usage limits [2]. It combines an account it checks every 60 seconds, OpenAI staff announcements and the OpenAI status page [2]. When a measured refill and an announcement disagree, it trusts the measured refill [2].

How do you install ccusage or use Codex Forecast?

ccusage can be run directly without a global installation using npx [1], or via npm or other package runners [1]. Codex Forecast is a website with a public API, so the site needs no install [2]. It needs no account [2].

It is free, with no account and no paid tier. [2]

Try Codex Forecast

Sources

  1. ccusage, github.com/ryoppippi/ccusage, read 2026-10-08
  2. Codex Forecast's own description of itself (the product of this site's publisher)

Related comparisons