SupaKeeper Plain comparisons of AI coding tools

How startup engineers compare agent outputs before merging

Learn how startup engineers can compare outputs from coding agents before merging, with a checklist, steps, and tools to review sessions side by side.

By SupaKeeper ยท

SupaKeeper is published by LunarWerx, which makes some of the tools compared here.

To compare agent outputs before merging, gather each output, check it against the task and the code it changes, and review the results in one place. AgentHydra shows Claude Code, Codex and OpenCode sessions on your machine in one searchable list, updated live while they run. [1]

OptionWhat it can doWhat to check
AgentHydraShows Claude Code, Codex and OpenCode sessions on your machine in one searchable list, updated live while they run. [1]The tray app needs Windows; macOS and Linux builds exist but have not been verified. [1]
Your team's existing review toolsThe diff and test tools your team already uses.Check whether they show each output's changes and test results side by side.
A separate code review toolA separate tool may help compare branches and diffs.Check which outputs it can compare and whether it can run your tests.

What you need before you start

Before comparing outputs, have the work from each agent available on your own machine, along with the branch or repository it changed. Know the task each agent was given, because the comparison is only useful against a clear goal. Keep the tests and checks your team already runs, so every output is judged the same way.

Decide what a merge-ready result looks like for this change. For a small startup team this is often a short list: the change does what the task asked, the existing tests pass, and the diff contains nothing unrelated. Write that list down before you open the outputs, so the comparison stays fair.

Gather the details that help you tell the outputs apart, such as which agent produced each one, which account or project it ran under, and when it finished. Clear names make the later steps quicker.

Step by step

  1. Collect every output that addresses the same task into one place, including the branch or diff each agent produced.
  2. Read the task statement again and confirm which outputs address it fully.
  3. Run the same tests and checks against each output, on a clean copy of the repository, so one output does not benefit from leftover state.
  4. Review each diff for changes outside the task, such as edited configuration files, new dependencies, or removed code.
  5. Compare the outputs side by side on the points in your merge list, and note the differences in plain words.
  6. Look at the commands that failed and were later fixed. A repeated failure can point to a weak approach, and the fixes can show what the agent learned about the repository.
  7. Pick one output to merge, or combine the best parts by hand, then rerun the checks on the final branch.
  8. Record why the other outputs were set aside, so the choice can be explained to the team later.

Tools that can do it

AgentHydra is made by the team that publishes this site.

AgentHydra shows Claude Code, Codex and OpenCode sessions on your machine in one searchable list, updated live while they run. [1] Use the list to find each output without opening each one separately.

AgentHydra pairs each failed shell command with the command that fixed it, and can copy those pairs out as a rules file for your agents. [1] Use these pairs to see which repeated mistakes came up during the work.

AgentHydra can pack a task and its repository into a Markdown file, leaving out common secret files, then copy a prompt and open ChatGPT for you to send yourself. [1] Use this if you want a second review of a diff from another model, and decide yourself what to send.

AgentHydra is free, with no account or subscription. [1] Its source code is open under the MIT License. [1]

Other options are the review tools your team already uses, and any separate tool you find. Check what each one shows about every output before choosing it.

Common mistakes to avoid

Avoid merging the first output that passes the tests without reading its diff. A passing test does not show that the change stays within the task.

Avoid comparing outputs on different copies of the repository. Results are only comparable when each output starts from the same state.

Avoid keeping outputs without clear names. When the names are unclear, it becomes hard to tell later which agent produced which change.

Avoid judging an output by the length or tone of the agent's summary. Check the diff and the test results instead.

Avoid combining parts by hand and skipping the rerun of the checks. The final branch needs its own test pass before it is merged.

Frequently asked questions

How do startup engineers compare agent outputs before merging?

They gather each output that addresses the same task, run the same tests on a clean copy of the repository, and review each diff for changes outside the task. They then compare the outputs against a short written list of what a merge-ready result looks like, and record why the other outputs were set aside. This keeps the choice fair and easy to explain to the rest of the team later.

Does AgentHydra show outputs from several coding agents in one list?

AgentHydra shows Claude Code, Codex and OpenCode sessions on your machine in one searchable list, updated live while they run. [1] You can find each output by its session details, so you do not need to open each one separately. Check that the sessions you need appear in the list before you rely on it for a comparison.

Is AgentHydra free for startup teams?

AgentHydra is free, with no account or subscription. [1] It is open source under the MIT License, so the source code is available to read. [1] The tray app needs Windows, and macOS and Linux builds have not been verified, so check the platform before your team installs it. [1]

Can ChatGPT review a diff from an agent output with AgentHydra?

AgentHydra can pack a task and its repository into a Markdown file, leaving out common secret files, then copy a prompt and open ChatGPT for you to send yourself. [1] You decide what gets sent and whether a second review is useful for your change. Look through the file for anything sensitive before you send it, even with the common secret files left out.

What mistakes should be avoided when comparing agent outputs before merging?

Common mistakes include merging the first output that passes the tests without reading its diff, comparing outputs on different copies of the repository, and judging an output by how confident the agent's summary sounds. Another mistake is skipping the final test run after combining parts by hand. Each of these can lead to a merge that looks correct but contains changes nobody reviewed.

Free, with no account or subscription. [1]

Try AgentHydra

Sources

  1. AgentHydra's own description of itself (the product of this site's publisher)

Related comparisons